Sunday, October 16, 2011

Every single Democrat but Hollings voted against Glass-Steagall repeal

Martha Koester provides this information about the repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999.

Even the bluest of the blue dogs. Every single Republican, even the more moderate ones, voted for it.  This needs to be shoved in the faces of the Larouchies and their Hitler moustaches.  The really bad news is that Clinton could have vetoed it, and with a 54/44 Yea vote, that veto would not have been overrriden.
YEAs - 54
NAYs - 44
Nay HI Akaka, Daniel D
Nay MT Baucus, Max D
Nay IN Bayh, Evan D
Nay DE Biden, Joseph D
Nay NM Bingaman, Jeff D
Nay CA Boxer, Barbara D
Nay LA Breaux, John D
Nay NV Bryan, Richard D
Nay WV Byrd, Robert D
Nay GA Cleland, J. D
Nay ND Conrad, Kent D
Nay SD Daschle, Thomas D
Nay CT Dodd, Christopher D
Nay ND Dorgan, Byron D
Nay IL Durbin, Richard D
Nay NC Edwards, John D
Nay WI Feingold, Russell D
Nay CA Feinstein, Dianne D
Nay FL Graham, Bob D
Nay IA Harkin, Thomas D
Nay HI Inouye, Daniel D
Nay SD Johnson, Tim D
Nay MA Kennedy, Edward D
Nay NE Kerrey, J. D
Nay MA Kerry, John D
Nay WI Kohl, Herbert D
Nay LA Landrieu, Mary D
Nay NJ Lautenberg, Frank D
Nay VT Leahy, Patrick D
Nay MI Levin, Carl D
Nay CT Lieberman, Joseph D
Nay AR Lincoln, Blanche D
Nay MD Mikulski, Barbara D
Nay NY Moynihan, Daniel D
Nay WA Murray, Patty D
Nay RI Reed, John D
Nay NV Reid, Harry D
Nay VA Robb, Charles D
Nay WV Rockefeller, John D
Nay MD Sarbanes, Paul D
Nay NY Schumer, Charles D
Nay NJ Torricelli, Robert D
Nay MN Wellstone, Paul D
Nay OR Wyden, Ron D
Yea MI Abraham, Spencer R
Yea CO Allard, Wayne R
Yea MO Ashcroft, John R
Yea UT Bennett, Robert R
Yea MO Bond, Christopher R
Yea KS Brownback, Samuel R
Yea KY Bunning, Jim R
Yea MT Burns, Conrad R
Yea CO Campbell, Ben R
Yea RI Chafee, John R
Yea MS Cochran, Thad R
Yea ME Collins, Susan R
Yea GA Coverdell, Paul R
Yea ID Craig, Larry R

Yea ID Crapo, Michael R
Yea OH DeWine, Michael R
Yea NM Domenici, Pete R
Yea WY Enzi, Michael R
Yea TN Frist, William R
Yea WA Gorton, T. R
Yea TX Gramm, Phil R
Yea MN Grams, Rod R
Yea IA Grassley, Charles R
Yea NH Gregg, Judd R
Yea NE Hagel, Charles R
Yea UT Hatch, Orrin R
Yea NC Helms, Jesse R

Yea SC Hollings, Ernest D
Yea AR Hutchinson, Tim
Yea TX Hutchison, Kay R
Yea VT Jeffords, James R
Yea AZ Kyl, Jon R
Yea MS Lott, Trent R
Yea IN Lugar, Richard R
Yea FL Mack, Connie R
Yea AZ McCain, John R
Yea KY McConnell, Mitch R
Yea AK Murkowski, Frank R
Yea OK Nickles, Don R
Yea KS Roberts, Pat R
Yea DE Roth, William R
Yea PA Santorum, Richard R
Yea AL Sessions, Jefferson R
Yea AL Shelby, Richard R
Yea NH Smith, Bob R
Yea OR Smith, Gordon R
Yea ME Snowe, Olympia R
Yea PA Specter, Arlen R

Yea AK Stevens, Ted R
Yea WY Thomas, Craig R
Yea TN Thompson, Fred R
Yea SC Thurmond, J. R
Yea OH Voinovich, George R
Yea VA Warner, John R
Not Voting OK Inhofe, James R
Present IL Fitzgerald, Peter R

And the research continues:

From: Diana McGinness
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 1:33 PM

Martha, you didn’t go far enough – that was only the first vote before it was reconciled with the House bill.  Only 7 Dems and 1 Rep voted against in the end.  We were sold out by the bi-partisan majorities in both parties. 


Nay        WI          Feingold, Russell [D]
Nay        ND          Dorgan, Byron [D]
Nay        NV          Bryan, Richard [D]
Nay        MN         Wellstone, Paul [D]
Nay        MD         Mikulski, Barbara [D]
Nay        IA           Harkin, Thomas [D]
Nay        CA          Boxer, Barbara [D]
Nay        AL          Shelby, Richard [R]

In the house: 5 Rs voted nay  and 52 Ds

Nay        CA-6      Woolsey, Lynn [D]
Nay        CA-7      Miller, George [R]
Nay        CA-9      Lee, Barbara [D]
Nay        CA-15    Campbell, Tom [R]
Nay        CA-18    Condit, Gary [D]
Nay        CA-29    Waxman, Henry [D]
Nay        CA-32    Dixon, Julian [D]
Nay        CA-33    Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D]
Nay        CA-35    Waters, Maxine [D]
Nay        CA-50    Filner, Bob [D]
Nay        CO-5      Hefley, Joel [R]
Nay        CT-2       Gejdenson, Sam [D]
Nay        CT-3       DeLauro, Rosa [D]
Nay        FL-5       Thurman, Karen [D]
Nay        FL-7       Mica, John [R]
Nay        FL-17     Meek, Carrie [D]
Nay        FL-23     Hastings, Alcee [D]
Nay        GA-4      McKinney, Cynthia [D]
Nay        GA-5      Lewis, John [D]
Nay        IL-1        Rush, Bobby [D]
Nay        IL-2        Jackson, Jesse [D]
Nay        IL-3        Lipinski, William [D]
Nay        IL-4        Gutierrez, Luis [D]
Nay        IL-7        Davis, Danny [D]
Nay        IL-9        Schakowsky, Janice [D]
Nay        IL-12      Costello, Jerry [D]
Nay        IL-17      Evans, Lane [D]
Nay        IL-19      Phelps, David [D]
Nay        MA-4     Frank, Barney [D]
Nay        MA-6     Tierney, John [D]
Nay        MA-7     Markey, Edward [D]
Nay        MA-8     Capuano, Michael [D]
Nay        MI-9       Kildee, Dale [D]
Nay        MI-13    Rivers, Lynn [D]
Nay        MI-14    Conyers, John [D]
Nay        MI-16    Dingell, John [D]
Nay        MN-6     Luther, William [D]
Nay        MS-5      Taylor, Gene [D]
Nay        MO-1     Clay, William [D]
Nay        NY-16    Serrano, José [D]
Nay        NY-26    Hinchey, Maurice [D]
Nay        OH-9      Kaptur, Marcy [D]
Nay        OH-10    Kucinich, Dennis [D]
Nay        OR-4      DeFazio, Peter [D]
Nay        PA-1       Brady, Robert [D]
Nay        PA-2       Fattah, Chaka [D]
Nay        PA-14     Coyne, William [D]
Nay        SC-1       Sanford, Marshall [R]
Nay        TX-6       Barton, Joe [R]
Nay        TX-11    Edwards, Thomas [D]
Nay        TX-28    Rodriguez, Ciro [D]
Nay        VT-0       Sanders, Bernard [I]
Nay        WA-1     Inslee, Jay [D]
Nay        WA-7     McDermott, James [D]
Nay        WI-2       Baldwin, Tammy [D]
Nay        WI-5       Barrett, Thomas [D]
Nay        WI-7       Obey, David [D]

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Join us at the 25th annual Eastside Dinner!

Everyone who has already bought a ticket to the Eastside Dinner can ignore this message, but if you have not now is the perfect time to buy a ticket!

For some background, the 25th Annual Eastside Democratic Dinner is nearly upon us. It's been a rough year, but now we're on the road to 2012. It's time to start thinking about the President's re-election, Maria Cantwell's Senate race, the open 10th Congressional, the Governor and AG's race, and a multitude of other elections. The dinner will feature a raucous speech by State Chairman Dwight Pelz, our Congressional leaders, other local elected officials, and hilarious MC's Tony Ventrella and Pat Cashman.

This Eastside Dinner is our primary fundraiser for 2012 operations and candidate donations. The work of supporting Democrats in 2012 starts on September, 25th. Proceeds benefit the 5th, 41st, 45th, and 48th LD's.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Republican War on Women

Republicans in Congress are on the warpath to implement their radical right agenda. Giving tax breaks to the wealthy reduces funds available for programs to help people that truly need help in this country. It's a question of priorities and the Republican priorities do not include women or their needs.
As the New York Times points out in an editorial aptly entitled The War on Women,
"Republicans in the House of Representatives are mounting an assault on women's health and freedom that would deny millions of women access to affordable contraception and life-saving cancer screenings and cut nutritional support for millions of newborn babies in struggling families. And this is just the beginning.

The budget bill pushed through the House ... included the defunding of planned parenthood and myriad other cuts detrimental to women ...

The egregious cuts in the House resolution include the elimination of support for Title X, the federal family planning program for low-income women that provides birth control, breast and cervical cancer screenings and testing for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. In the absence of Title X's preventative care , some women will die. The Guttmacher Institute, a leading authority on reproductive health, says a rise in unintended pregnancies would result in some 400,000 more abortions a year."
'The New York Times editorial ends with some important words to consider, that could just as easily be dealing with any other area Republicans in Congress are trying to cut funding for or repeal. "These are treacherous times for women's reproductive rights and access to essential health care."

Substitute environment, labor, consumer protection, science, or any other area that Democrats have worked over the years to support to make America a better country for all and these are treacherous times. Only a blind person would not see the treacherous times for our country that the Republicans want to lead us into.

Please contact your elected officials and tell them to oppose this treachery by the right wing. Support the Democratic Party and elected Democrats and tell them you have their back and that they must not cave in to the far right agenda.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Democrat Bob Ferguson to Announce Run for Attorney General on Valentine's Day

King County Council member Bob Ferguson has sent an e-mail out last night to announce his bid to be the next Attorney General of Washington State. His plans have not really been so secret and neither are the plans of the current Attorney General Republican Rob McKenna's preparation and desire to be Washington State's next Governor.

Bob Ferguson intends to officially announce his campaign to run for Attorney General later today- February 14th, 2011. The election is not until next year but next year will be a busy year, what with President Obama being on the ballot and Senator Maria Cantwell here in Washington State, along with a total of 10 Congressional seats and all the State races from Governor on down and the Legislative races.

So it is a wise decision to get an early start for a statewide race. Bob Ferguson has campaigned hard in his previous races, taking on an incumbent in his 1st race for King County Council and then with the downsizing of the Council, being forced to run against another incumbent to retain his seat.

Bob Ferguson has put up a website at He also has a video up on his website as part of his kickoff.

He also has a facebook page up at Bob Ferguson for Attorney General.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

King County Democrats LAC Newsletter #2

February 5, 2011

Introduction: This newsletter goes out to active Democrats in King County. Sarajane Siegfriedt is the legislative action newsletter editor. Sarajane Siegfriedt is the Co-Chair of the LAC. You can track bills and contact your legislators by going to their website at or leave a message for your three legislators (and the Governor) at the toll-free Legislative Hotline, 1-800-562-6000. Your legislators' email addresses follow the form:

Our Legislative Agenda, passed by King County Democrats on January 24th, is posted on (look for LAC on the left tab). It directs us in our bill tracking. Please don't let this limit you from being vocal about other issues of importance.

Bill Status Chart: In addition to this narrative newsletter, we are tracking the bills in our agenda and posting these to our website for quick reference Look here to find recommended actions for this week.

Our annual Lobby Day will be held on Presidents Day, Monday February 21st from 11 to 1:30 p.m. The Governor and all our 39 King County Democratic legislators are our invited guests, followed by district meetings with your legislators (set up by LAC District Chairs.) The $20 cost includes a box lunch and materials. Please reserve your seat as seating in the Senate Rules Committee room is limited. (Find it by entering the Lt. Governor's office on the 2nd Floor of the Legislative Building. Contact Sarajane Siegfriedt at to reserve a spot at our Lobby Day in Olympia.

For February 5th

This newsletter is longer than usual, because of the Supplemental Budget that will be completed this week and the introduction of several of our key bills. For brief status, go directly to the Bill Status Chart

Contents: This newsletter contains current news on the following issues:

• Initiative Reform Bill—Hearings this Week
• Revenue & Repealing Corporate Tax Breaks
• Environment: Decommissioning TransAlta’s Coal-fired Power Plant
• Protecting Human Services & Education in the Supplemental Budget
• A Balanced Approach to Unemployment Insurance—What Happened?
• Criminal Justice: Medical Marijuana
• Housing: Passing the Fair Tenant Screening Act
• Payday Lending: Don’t gut the law
• Progress on Washington Investment Trust

Election & Initiative Reform
Initiative Reform Bill Introduced—Hearings this Week

Introduced by Rep. Chris Reykdal, (D - Olympia) (D) on January 28, 2011, to clarify and update regulations concerning signature gathering for initiatives and to raise the filing fee for initiatives to $500. If the Secretary of State for the general election ballot certifies the measure, the sponsor receives a refund of $450. The bill allows a waiver of the filing fee if a sponsor demonstrates lack of sufficient assets and submits at least 1,000 valid signatures. (Companion: SB 5297).

Both ballot measure reform bills have a hearing this week - House State Government and Tribal Affairs committee on Wednesday Feb. 9th at 8 AM and Senate Government Operations committee on Thursday, Feb. 10th at 10 AM. If you are in Olympia either or both of those days, please sign in PRO to support HB 1668 and SB 5297.

Action Needed:
Email House State Government and Senate Government Operations committee members know you support the bills (Representatives Miloscia, Hunt, Appleton, Darnielle, Dunshee, Hurst, McCoy and Senators Pridemore, Prentice, Chase). If you or your organization has a Facebook page, link to "Pass Bill to Prevent Fraud" page at

Our main message is to protect the integrity of our ballot measure process by preventing fraud and other abuses to the system. HB 1668 and SB 5207 increase transparency and accountability and makes the process better for all the people of Washington. See the Win/Win Network for more information.

Constitutional Amendment to Reverse Citizens United Decision
House Joint Memorial HJM 4005 has been introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. For more info and a list of co-sponsors, go here:

Summary Digest of HJM 4005: Urges Congress to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution for the states' consideration which provides that corporations are not persons under the laws of the United States or any of its jurisdictional subdivisions. For a one-page flyer about this is posted on website:
(Look at section of Downloads page on Citizens United) --

Revenue & Tax Reform
Let Wall Street Pay for Basic Health
HB 1847 introduced by Rep. Eileen Cody, (D-West Seattle) (D) on February 4, 2011, terminates certain tax exemptions to provide funding for maintaining Basic Health Program. Places a cap on providers of the first mortgage reduction at $100 million per year. Eliminates the exemption for the airplane excise tax on ownership transfers of aircraft and sets a new excise tax rate for aircraft. Imposes a sales and use tax on cosmetic medical services. Repeals the TransAlta sales tax exemption for coal used at coal-fired electric generation plant at Centralia. Would take effect April 1, 2011. Referred to House Ways & Means.
From our Fuse coalition partner in the Our Economic Future Coalition:

28,000 activists spoke out, and legislators are listening.

Three weeks ago we delivered more than 28,000 petitions to the Legislature demanding an end to tax giveaways to special interests. Now Rep. Eileen Cody has released a bill (HB 1847) that would close tax loopholes for Wall Street Banks, elective cosmetic surgery, and private jets. The money we save would be dedicated to Basic Health, which provides health coverage for tens of thousands of working families in Washington.

Our state’s budget shortfall means we need to look even more carefully at every dollar we spend, and these tax giveaways simply don’t add up. But Wall Street Banks and other special interests have their lobbyists in Olympia fighting tooth and nail to maintain their lucrative, unfair loopholes.

It’s going to take a huge grassroots response to overcome their lobbyists’ insider influence. Tell your representative to stand with Washington families, not special interests by supporting HB 1847. Click below to send a message:

Rep. Cody’s bill will level the playing field and ensure that everyone pays their fair share – especially corporate special interests. At a time when teachers are being laid off, programs shuttered, and every cent squeezed, we can’t afford these tax giveaways that enrich big corporations and the ultra-wealthy at the expense of our communities.
From Publicola
Publicola’s Fizz spoke with state Rep. Eileen Cody (D-34, W. Seattle) about the legislation she introduced to close several corporate tax loopholes, including the $5 million tax break for TransAlta’s Centralia coal plant and an estimated $60 million break for banks.
Could she get the two-thirds vote required to pass tax increases (closing loopholes has been interpreted as a tax increase)? Cody acknowledged that she wasn’t going to get the two-thirds. (She also agreed that her proposal would require a two thirds vote.) “I’m just starting a conversation that we need to have [about these tax breaks],” she said. Cody also said she wanted to highlight how difficult it is to get a two-thirds vote
Last year, social service and health care advocates presented a list of tax breaks totaling around $1 billion.

Decommissioning TransAlta’s Coal-fired Power Plant

House Bill 1825 (Strengthening local economies by reducing emissions from coal-fired power generation through decommissioning) Introduced by Rep. Marko Liias, (D-Mukilteo) (D), requires a preliminary decommissioning plan from coal-fired by July 1, 2013. This act requires coal-fired plants to pay a fee to the Department of Ecology each year until such operations cease. This act only applies to plants located in the State which have combusted more than one million tons of coal during any of the five preceding years. Referred to the House Environment Committee on 2/3/11.

“At the end of the useful life, the closure of these facilities, including the removal of structures, site reclamation, and preparation of the site for future beneficial usage, requires significant planning and funding. To ensure that all toxic materials are removed from these facilities and that the surrounding communities are fully assured that all applicable and appropriate remediation standards are met, it is necessary to require that the facility owner demonstrate during the facility's operation that sufficient funding will be available for closure and post-closure activities.”

For more information, see Environmental Priorities Coalition:

Protect Human Services & Education in the Supplemental Budget
First, the Senate has taken quick action–contrary to earlier concerns that undue delay in enacting needed cuts would only result in the need to make even great cuts and also jeopardize the state’s credit rating (according to the State Treasurer).
Second, there is ample evidence that the Senate–like the House–seriously listened to budgetary input (including grassroots advocates in a number of instances) and at least tried to moderate and reconfigure the human services budget in order to limit harm. Legislators are at least trying, despite the miserable fiscal picture.
Some examples:
Looks like the Senate basically mirrors the House mental health budget, which is a vast improvement (i.e., much less damaging) than the Governor’s provisions. For instance, the cut to state only dollars for the non-Medicaid population is $12.6m rather than $18m – among several other improvements.
Disability Lifeline unfortunately takes a hit. The House preserved both medical benefits and cash assistance. The Senate preserves medical assistance but eliminates the cash grant. On the other hand the Senate at least heard advocates’ testimony about the cash assistance being critical to housing, as the budget also allocates $2m “for housing and other services aimed at stabilizing and transitioning the DL-U population.” (Not that we necessarily want to accept this compromise).
While the Governor eliminated Child Advocacy Center (child abuse victim support) and Street Youth (shelter) money, both the House and Senate preserve these items. The crime victim services funded through the Department of Commerce do not seem to be hit any harder than they were in the House.
Like the House and Governor, the Senate proposes to consolidate some of the institutions (residential rehabilitation centers) for people with developmental disabilities; and the Senate actually achieves about another $1m in savings in this manner. Many developmental disabilities advocates support this consolidation for a combination of fiscal and policy reasons. Besides the cost savings, they value the inclusion of people with developmental disabilities in the community (with needed support services) rather than their isolation in institutions. (Democrats are on both sides of this issue.) Supported employment for people with Developmental Disabilities take the same reductions as in the House proposal.
Unlike the House, the Senate does not take a million away from Homeless Housing Assistance.
As did the House, the Senate reduces the Governor’s $9m cut to Food Assistance to $4.8m. In addition, the related Senate language is better in that it does not permit eligibility reductions.
--Thanks to Seth Dawson, human services lobbyist. To receive his updates directly, email him:
Update on Thursday 2/3 by Niki Reading, the Capitol Record
The Senate version of early action cuts is out, and here’s what I’m learning as I go along:
- The Senate class size reduction cut is smaller than that proposed by Gov. Chris Gregoire and the House
- The Senate budget eliminates the Higher Education Coordinating Board, saving $9 million
- Eliminate Council of Presidents
- The Senate reinstates the cut to Career and Wage Ladder in Early Education that Gregoire proposed and the House did not include
- The Senate version makes a smaller cut to the Basic Health Plan. The governor had proposed a $26.8 million cut, the House adopted a $19.6 million cut, and the Senate proposes a $10.3 million cut.
- It makes a big cut to the Disability Lifeline cash grant — to the tune of $18.5 million. The House version included no reduction and the governor had proposed a $20.3 million cut.
- It includes a DSHS “management reduction” of $1.7 million — neither the House nor the governor had this item
- It saves $3.4 million by cutting state employee pay and $1 million by cutting agency public relations positions.
Update 2: Here’s the bill report. The bill is sponsored by the Senate Ways and Means Committee — meaning it’s bipartisan.
Update on Thursday 2/3 by Josh Feit at Publicola:
Senate Ways and Means Chair Sen. Ed Murray (D-43, Capitol Hill, U. District) released a statement:
“Washington cannot afford to keep spending at our current rate. Our conversation with the public is no longer about all the good ways we can spend their money. It’s about what we’re going to cut. It’s about doing less with less. We need to be honest about this.”
He also released his own highlights of how his budget differs from the House version:
• Reducing but not eliminating class-size reduction efforts in K-4 classrooms
• Eliminating the Higher Education Coordinating Board and Council of Presidents
• Transferring tuition funds for financial aid purposes
• Preserving state funded research
• Preserving the Basic Health Plan by tightening eligibility
• Tightening eligibility for the Children’s Health Program
• Eliminating cash grants for the Disability Lifeline
• Not cutting adult day health care
• Taking a three percent pay reduction for non-represented state workers three months early
Disability Lifeline
The Senate’s budget preserved Disability Lifeline medical but nearly eliminated cash grants (reduced from $339 per month to $258 per month effective Jan. 1, 2011). This is very unfortunate since we know that cash provides stable housing for the DL population and will help recipients to achieve positive health outcomes from medical care. In addition, most people go to DSHS to sign up for cash grants. The medical benefits are an added bonus, so we may see fewer people accessing DL medical if cash grants are eliminated.
Action Needed:
Advocates should continue to email Ways & Means Committee members and our own legislators for Disability Lifeline cash grants and other human services. Low-income housing advocates should note that residents pay 30% of their income in rent, and that this will eliminate a source of income for low-income housing operations, possibly endangering them.
Labor—A Balanced Approach to Unemployment Insurance: What Happened?

From Sen. Adam Kline’s 37th District Newsletter
Senate Bill 5135 will provide immediate tax relief to 90% of employers around the state, to the tune of roughly $300 million in tax relief for businesses this year. It also makes a technical fix in state law that will make the state eligible for federally funded, extended unemployment benefits through 2011.

The legislation comes at a time when UI tax rates are set to increase by an average of 36 percent in 2011 and when nearly one in five Washingtonians is either unemployed or under-employed. In the latter part of 2008 and in 2009, with unemployment rates rising, the state paid out significantly more in benefits than it collected in taxes, causing a dramatic increase in the 2010 and 2011 tax rates.

The legislation now goes to the House of Representatives for consideration. In order for the tax cuts to take effect this year, the legislation must be passed by the full Legislature and signed by the Governor by Tuesday, Feb. 8.

Labor—Unemployment Insurance—from WSLC’s David Groves
Passage of the federal extended Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits is necessary by mid- to late-March to continue allowing folks in Washington to receive UI benefits beyond 26 weeks up to 99 weeks. Both parties support its passage. But Republicans--and a handful of Democrats--are trying to pass it along with a one-year temporary tax cut for business so they don't have to pass a second UI bill later in the session. In doing so, they hope to avoid both the Governor's training benefits and Labor’s proposal for a children's benefit. In other words, business would get what it wants and struggling families get nothing.

Update from Labor lead Brad Larssen and from WSLC David Groves:
As we went to press Friday, the substitute Unemployment Insurance bill SSB 5135 was passed by the Senate by a majority of Democrats, who supported it because of the UI benefits extension for 99 weeks. However, the substitute version was amended by six renegade Democrats and a majority of Republicans. The six Democrats ignored their caucus leadership who hoped to pass some concessions to help workers in exchange for reducing UI rates at a time when unemployment is at its highest. [Several years ago, employers begged to have their rates reduced when unemployment was low and are now refusing to pay higher rates when the economy is bad. We want to know, what happened to their private “rainy day” funds?]
These Senators are: Hatfield (19th), Hobbs (44th), Kastama (25th), Pridemore (49th), Sheldon (35th), and Rodney Tom (48th).
Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown scheduled a vote to advance the one-year tax cut bill (SB 5135) and House Speaker Frank Chopp planned quick action to get it to the governor's desk, and avoid the tax increase.
But then business lobbying groups hatched a plan to get what they wanted now, and avoid any bill #2 benefit improvements to balance the effort. They urged state Senators to defy the Majority Leader and amend the bill on the floor to add a federal unemployment benefit extension to SB 5135. That is the only remaining element of the governor's original bill that absolutely requires action this session. If it is added to SB 5135, there is no longer any motivation for a bill #2 this session. Business groups would simply come back next year, point to another inevitable spike in tax rates when their temporary tax cut is about to expire, and get it extended again.
Criminal Justice: Medical Marijuana
Medical Marijuana SB 5073 would establish a state-regulated system of licensed producers, processors and dispensers. The system would be overseen by the state departments of Agriculture and Health. Local governments would be free to adopt zoning regulations regarding siting of these facilities and advertising would be restricted.
Such a system would be a major improvement over the current patchwork of unregulated entities that serve as the only practical source of medical marijuana for many qualifying patients.
The bill proposes to protect qualifying patients who comply with the law from being arrested and prosecuted. They would be treated no differently than patients who rely on prescription medications to help maintain their quality of life.
Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles and Rep. Jim Moeller introduce changes to medical marijuana rules

Housing & Human Services: Portable Background Checks
Spotlight on a Low-Income Housing Alliance priority:
Passing the Fair Tenant Screening Act HB 1526 (Rep. Orwall)
The Fair Tenant Screening Act addresses three interconnected issues all related to tenant screening: The high cost of repeated tenant screening reports, the lack of transparency in those reports and the need to prevent inaccurate and misleading information from being included in the reports. By addressing these issues, the bill is designed to eliminate barriers to housing that tenants across the state struggle with.
The high cost of repeated reports: The tenant screening industry is a growing and largely unregulated sector that plays a central role in a landlord’s decision to rent to a tenant or not. The companies are both out-of-state and home-grown and charge fees between $35 and $50 per report. The tenant pays the cost of each report, frequently purchasing separate reports for each person over the age of 18. Tenants are forced to pay these costs each time they apply for housing. Only one company on the market provides a portable report and landlords are not required to accept it, which means tenants purchasing a portable report have no guarantee that their prospective landlord will accept it —and unfortunately few do. The costs of these screening reports are added on top of the high costs of moving, including reserving money for a new deposit, first and last month’s rent, utility set-ups and more.
The bill requires landlords to accept portable reports and that tenant screening companies make their reports portable or that the cost of the report be borne by the landlord.
Lack of transparency in the content of the reports: Tenants purchase tenant-screening reports each time they apply for a new home. Even though tenants pay the full cost, tenant screening companies refuse to share copies with any tenants. This presents maddening obstacles for tenants who are told that their applications for housing are denied because of the content of a tenant screening report that they can’t see or correct.
The bill requires that tenant screening companies give tenants a copy of the report.
Preventing inaccurate or misleading information in the reports: Tenant screening reports can currently contain information that can tell a misleading story about a tenant. For example, the report always highlights if a tenant has been party to an eviction lawsuit, but it never says if the tenant won or lost the lawsuit, or even if the lawsuit was dismissed. It is common sense that simply being named a party to a lawsuit does not mean you’re guilty. Unfortunately, tenant screening companies do not care and simply report on the gross fact, never expending the minimal time necessary to report on the actual facts.
Additionally, tenant-screening companies insist on being able to retain the right to report information that is illegal for a landlord to use in their consideration of an application. For example, it is illegal for landlords to discriminate against victims of domestic violence. Allowing discrimination would continue the cycle of violence. Maddeningly, tenant screening companies fight for their “right” to continue to report that a tenant has filed protection orders, even though this hands information to a landlord that they are not supposed to use in their decision to rent to that tenant or not.
The bill changes the law so that tenant screening reports cannot include inappropriate information, such as information about a protective order, or the fact of an eviction lawsuit that was dismissed in court or won by a tenant.
Action Needed:
Ask your representatives and the House Judiciary Committee to support the Fair Tenant Screening Act, HB 1526 or attend the hearing (TBA).
Banking, Foreclosure & Predatory Lending Reform
Don’t Gut Payday Loan Law—Instead Stop the Moneytree Abuses

from Sen. Adam Kline’s 37th District newsletter

Based on an anonymous tip from a constituent in the 37th district, the Department of Financial Institutions has succeeded in halting a shady payday loan practice.

Last April a constituent called me to blow the whistle on Moneytree, a payday lender. She claimed Moneytree was giving more than eight payday loans to individual customers during a one-year period, thus breaking a law passed by the Legislature in 2009. Over the course of several conversations, the constituent provided me with ample information about MoneyTree’ S practices, and I worked with the good folks at our State Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) to figure out the shady bookkeeping strategies Moneytree was using to get around the law.

By painstakingly reviewing MoneyTree’ S lending records, DFI was able to establish that the company appeared to be allowing borrowers to obtain the maximum allowable number of small loans and then repackaging those loans into a single, larger loan so they can take out even more loans. Moneytree was giving some of these folks upwards of 30 loans. Based on their research, DFI issued a temporary cease and desist order to Moneytree to force them to stop the allegedly illegal practices while the courts looked into the practice.

I'm happy to report that in mid-January, the court agreed with DFI, and ruled that the practice is indeed illegal. Moneytree and other payday lenders won't be able to use this strategy anymore.

Unfortunately payday lenders have found other ways to skirt the law. Very recently DFI started going after other payday lenders who appear to be circumventing the 8-loan limit using a different strategy. This time the payday lenders are selling gift cards to borrowers. The transaction works almost the same as a normal payday loan transaction. A borrower gives the lender a post-dated check, but instead of giving the borrower cash, the lender issues a gift card to a retail establishment like Wal-Mart, for example. The borrower pays the same amount of interest and fees they would receive in a cash loan. The lenders say since they're selling a product (i.e., a gift card) rather than handing out cash, they don't have to comply with the 8-loan limit. But DFI and the Northwest Justice Project (NJP is working separately from DFI on a lawsuit against a lender engaging in this practice) maintain that since the transaction works exactly the same except for the fact that the borrower gets a gift card instead of cash, it's still a "payday loan." NJP filed a lawsuit against one lender, Cash 1. DFI has issued a cease and desist order against a different lender, Checkmania (also known as Checkmate), for making illegal loans.

Along with these various strategies to skirt the 8-loan maximum, payday lenders are trying to entirely do away with the limit through legislation. SB 5547 and HB 1678 would both eliminate the 8-loan maximum, and would allow lenders to go back to making an unlimited amount of loans to individuals. I'd like to outlaw payday loans entirely. That year, I proposed a bill to do away with this usurious industry. Instead, we passed a narrower law that placed some limits on the industry, including the 8-loan maximum. I'll do my best to make sure we don't increase the ability of payday lenders to rip off their customers.

Progress on Washington Investment Trust (state bank) bill
From Rep. Bob Hasegawa, sponsor and prime mover of the Washington Investment Trust (state bank) bill
The State Treasurer’s argument that HB 1320 is unconstitutional is wrong because it (HB1320) doesn’t create an operational bank. It creates a Blue Ribbon Task Force, weighted toward bankers and financial institution experts, that will recommend trailer legislation for the 2012 session in order to become operational. So, the constitutional question will be addressed at that time, if necessary. You’ll recall the 2007 session when we passed a constitutional amendment HJR 4215, supported by McIntire, that was necessary to implement an underlying bill that allowed investment of the state’s Permanent Higher Education Trust Fund into the stock market. The constitutional amendment was necessary because there was a prohibition against investing that money into something that could lose money. It was passed by the people in the next general election.
As for the banks, I’m working on language to address their concern against competition and hope they’ll at least go neutral if not in support. Remember, the commercial banks in North Dakota have a great working relationship with the Bank of North Dakota as a bankers’ bank and as a lending partner. In fact, they feel more comfortable partnering with BND than other commercial banks because they don’t have to worry about their “partner” stealing their customer in the future, because BND doesn’t compete with them.
I believe this is about doing what’s best for small businesses—creating access to capital—and as a small business advocate yourself, you know this is their #1 problem, and our #1 way to help them and create jobs.
--[Rep.] Bob Hasegawa
The Education news this week is in the Supplemental Budget for 2011. The Senate treats K-12 education with fewer cuts than the House, which uses the money to preserve Basic Health and Disability Lifeline grants. The Senate imposes severe cuts to Higher Education. Olympia watchers expect that the 2-year budget will generally follow the outlines of the Supplemental Budget.

Action needed:
Contact the respective Ways & Means Committees on these funding issues.

We are looking for one or two education issues issue leads.

Support the King County Democrats Now!

Renew your membership or join by downloading our donation form at:

You can also donate online at

Basic membership is $40, family is $75, student/living lightly $20. Become a supporting member by donating $100, $250, $500 or $1000 or more.
We need and appreciate your help. Only with the help of concerned Democrats like yourself can we be an effective organization. Thank you.

Contact Information

Sarajane Siegfriedt -
Craig Salins -
Steve Zemke - Chair - King County Democrats


Saturday, January 15, 2011

Invitation to join Dr. Bobby Virk and

his partner, Dr. Ellen Polsky, for a Coalition to Fund Dental Access-sponsored forum on Dental Medicaid for legislators. A panel will present the impacts of adult dental program reductions on patient health, community clinic access and hospital ER use.
Thursday January 20, 2011, 5:00 pm
Cherberg Building at the Capitol
Conference Room ABC
Light refreshments will be served.
Please consider attending this important event and make reservations to -
Thank you,
Susan Sheary for
Dr. Bobby Virk

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Port Commissioner John Creighton Announces Campaign For King County Council

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011 John Creighton 425-636-8924

Port of Seattle Commissioner John Creighton announced today he will campaign for King County Council Position 6 (currently held by Councilmember Jane Hague).

“I’m proud of the work I’ve done with my colleagues on the Commission to bring the Port of Seattle from an agency that was under federal investigation to one that will set a record in container traffic for the year despite the down economy,” said Creighton. “I’d like to take that same focus on reform and results to the King County Council,” he added.

Reforming County Government

Creighton believes the King County Council needs to make tough reforms starting with the structure of the King County Council. Creighton proposes:

Lowering the number of King County Councilmembers to seven.
Reducing the pay of King County Councilmembers to under six figures.

“I know when compared to the overall county budget, the council reforms are small. However, we need to create a culture of efficient delivery of government services throughout the organization, and that needs to start at the top,” said Creighton. Creighton also proposes a number of reforms that will provide more accountability to taxpayers and lessen the burden on jobs-creating businesses:

Reducing duplicative efforts of regional governments by looking for areas to collaborate and share services.
Streamlining permitting and licensing processes at the county.
Providing more transparent accounting so taxpayers know where there money is being spent.

Protecting Our Environment

As a Port Commissioner, John Creighton spearheaded the passage of a 6-part environmental motion that made important environmental changes such as prohibiting cruise ship dumping in the Olympic Marine National Sanctuary, mandated the use of low sulfur diesel or shore power by cruise ships, and directed staff to work with King County on a biomass disposal. He supported the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy, a collaborative initiative with the ports of Tacoma and Vancouver and local port-related businesses to reduce port-related air emissions, and championed clean air and water initiatives at Sea-Tac Airport.

As a County Councilmember, Creighton proposes:

Prioritizing work on protecting Puget Sound including appointing one person to oversee all storm water management issues at the county level.
Incentivizing property owners to fix outdated septic systems to limit pollution and runoff.
Putting on the ballot a dedicated source of funding to clean up Puget Sound.
Exploring incentives for agricultural landowners in the county to switch to organic farming.

“I’ve taken the lead on a number of tough environmental issues such as cruise ship dumping. I’d like to take that same approach as a King County Councilmember on issues like storm water runoff and cleaning Puget Sound,” said Creighton.

Ensuring Transportation Choices

“Our regional governments get too mired in process and delay. A good example of this is the South Park Bridge project. The bridge will now be closed for three years because regional government couldn’t act and get a proposal in place. We need stronger leadership at the County level so projects that are vital to commuting and freight mobility move forward,” said Creighton.

As a County Councilmember, John Creighton supports:

Moving decisions on bus service and light rail away from political negotiations to decisions based on ridership and engineering recommendations.
Completing the South Park Bridge Project as soon as possible with no more delays.
Reducing overhead for both Sound Transit and Metro and reducing duplication of the agencies.

About John Creighton

John Creighton is a business lawyer who practiced on the east coast and overseas prior to returning to his home in the Northwest. He was elected to the Seattle Port Commission in November 2005, and was chosen by his colleagues to serve as Commission President for two consecutive years (2007-2008). He spearheaded the effort to find a new chief executive for the port, and has sat on both the audit and strategic planning subcommittees of the Port Commission.

Since being elected to the Commission, John has developed strong expertise in both transportation and economic policy. He was appointed by Washington Governor Chris Gregoire to the State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board in 2006. He has served on the board of enterpriseSeattle, the economic development organization for King County, and was appointed to the board of the Seattle Convention and Visitors Bureau in 2010. John is also currently the chair of the advisory board of the Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle's Pathways for Small Business Initiative, a program that helps equip small disadvantaged contractors with the business skills necessary to grow their businesses.

John grew up on the Eastside of King County and is a graduate of Interlake High School in Bellevue. John lives in Kirkland, WA.


Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Port of Seattle unanimously adopts Tarleton's green-trade initiative

Press Release from Commissioner Gael Tarleton

SEATTLE - Port of Seattle Commissioners today unanimously adopted a new and accelerated clean air initiative introduced by Commissioner Gael Tarleton that is aimed at meeting federal clean air standards two years ahead of schedule.

"We have already removed more than 260 of the dirtiest short-haul trucks off the road while still working to protect Puget Sound air and jobs," Tarleton said. "We are cleaning the air, protecting and creating jobs while growing trade in one of the toughest economies we've ever faced. This is a major accomplishment for Seattle's clean-trade goals."

The Port launched a special buy-back and retrofit program in 2009 by leveraging approximately $5 million from Port operating dollars and grants from the EPA and the state's Department of Ecology to retrofit pre-1994 trucks. The Port invested an estimated $1.7 million of its own operating dollars towards the total $5 million utilized for the program.

The new initiative is designed to further accelerate the Port's success by beefing up incentives to grow Seattle's clean trade. Key components of the new initiative include:

· A new affordable and reduced insurance program for drivers who participate in the Port's clean trucks/clean fuels program;
· A clean fuels tax incentive, providing benefits to drivers and companies whose trucks use clean fuels;
· A clean-trade rewards program for companies in Washington that support drivers who participate in the Port's clean truck/clean fuels programs;
· A detailed audit of Port truck emissions to ensure the Port is on track to meet federal clean air requirements by 2015 - two years earlier than the federal mandate of 2017. The Port will present the findings of its audit to the Commission in December 2011.

Since 2009, the Port has registered more than 5,900 trucks and more than 1,100 trucking companies and truck owners who operate drayage trucks (short-haul truckers) at the Port's cargo terminals for its clean-truck initiative. Drayage trucks with engines older than model-year 1994 may be eligible for a $5,000 incentive through the Port's ScRAPS (Scrappage and Retrofits for Air in Puget Sound) program which continues until the end of this January.

"We have the highest number of containers and cruise ships coming into the Port of Seattle when the rest of the ports in America have witnessed dramatic declines," said Tarleton. "When California launched its program, it taxed containers to scrap old trucks, but they scrapped the fees and mandates when they lost jobs and 40 percent of the port market share literally drove away. Seattle's program is a model for the nation and this economy."

# # #

Monday, January 3, 2011

LAC Meeting, January 16th

The next meeting of the King County Democrats Legislative Action Committee is the 3rd Sunday January 16th from 2 to 4 p.m. at the Des Moines Library. We will be discussing the issues in our proposed legislative agenda, and issues coordinators are invited to give a five minute presentation and answer questions. The Washington State Budget & Policy Center will have an analyst to discuss revenue priorities & strategy.

We are asking each Legislative District, as part of your reorganization, to elect or appoint an LAC representative or chair. This job is to attend our monthly meetings on the 3rd Sunday of the month and to report back to LD meetings, including organizing carpool groups to attend our Lobby Day in Olympia on Monday, February 21st.

Attendees will get briefings on our issues to prepare them to meet directly with their legislators and a box lunch ($20 registration in advance). All the King County legislators are invited to address the meeting, and the Governor has been invited to keynote. Attendance is limited and pre-registration is required. Sarajane Siegfriedt,, 206-440-5829 for questions. Many will stay in Olympia for the Washington State Democrats Crab Feed at 5 p.m. in Lacey.

Sarajane Siegfriedt, Chair
King County Democrats Legislative Action Committee
Des Moines Library

21620 11th Avenue S., Des Moines, 98198


The library is located on the corner of South 216th Street and 11th Avenue South, next to Des Moines City Hall and across the street from Wesley Homes Retirement Center.

Click here for a "printer friendly" version of the map & directions

I-5 Northbound: Take Exit 149B, and head west on Highway 516 (Kent-Des Moines Road). Turn right on Pacific Highway S (Highway 99). At the next major intersection, turn left on 216th Street. After going down the hill, turn left on 11th Avenue.

I-5 Southbound:
Take Exit 151. At the stop sign, go straight ahead on 200th Street. At the next major intersection, turn left on International Boulevard (Highway 99/Pacific Highway S). At the third stoplight, turn right on 216th Street. After going down the hill, turn left on 11th Avenue.

From Burien:
Head south on First Avenue, which becomes Marine View Drive. At the first four-way intersection with lights, turn left on 7th Place South, which becomes 216th Street. At the top of the small hill, turn right on 11th Avenue.

Bus Routes:
The Des Moines Library is served by bus routes 121, 122, 131, 132, and 166.
Metro Route 166 stops immediately outside the Des Moines Library on South 216th Street. Route 132 has a stop across the street from the QFC in Des Moines, which is about 1/4 of a mile from the library.

For bus times, call Metro's Rider Information line at 206-553-3000 or 800-542-7876 or visit their Web site.

Draft LAC Agenda for 2011